A couple of
weeks ago a bicycle retailer in Melbourne closed up shop and called on the
government to restrict damaging internet retailers. Now many people will see this
event as a consequence of increasing competition from the internet. But the
real story is not simply a matter of the internet competition, the deeper issue
is about a fundamental shift in the economic value of skills and expertise of
retailers, and the increasing maturity of consumers.
The bike
retailer is such a good example of the self-delusion the retail industry is
facing. It is the sound of dinosaurs complaining about evolution. The lack of
GST for retail purchased under $1000 has become the scapegoat for the industry,
but if there is any form of retail that is least impacted by international
internet sales it is bulky goods such as bicycles. A quick scan of Ebay reveals
that cheapest shipping of a single bike from the US is around $300 and UPS can
charge in excess of $1000, so no-one is going to buy a bike from the net just
to save up to $100 on GST!
So let’s
assume that what has really killed the Melbourne bike retailer is competition
from local internet retailers, who are probably buying their stock from exactly
the same wholesalers, and paying more or less the same GST. The internet retail has no retail premises to
pay rent for, probably orders stock on demand and doesn’t need any retail sales
staff. How can the bricks and mortar guys compete?
Well they
can’t. That is the point. The only thing that keeps them going is inertia and consumer
habits. Which means that there can be no gradual decline here; once consumers
make the switch to internet shopping it is over. Now retailers think that they
can charge a premium because they offer “service”. Retailers argue that sales
staff know the merchandise and can offer customers advice to help them make the
best decision from a wide range of choices.
They used to complain that people would come into the store to find out
about a product and then go online to purchase. What rubbish.
The internet
is full of real experts. People who buy the products, use the products and are
happy to share experiences and provide feedback without any self interest. Good
sales staff may know how to sell, but no sensible consumer with the internet at
their disposal would trust the advice of a salesperson. No retailer argues
about being the primary source of advice for consumers any more.
For any
significant purchase a consumer is going to walk in to a retailer with a good
idea on exactly what they want to purchase, and what price they expect to pay.
The most common question a retailer will get now is simply “do you have it in
stock at the advertised price?” Except for impulse purchases the only real
service that retail provides is immediate availability. And if a consumer is
willing to wait a day or two for delivery they are almost certainly going to be
able to get a significant discount.
This is the
current state of retail, but this is not a status quo that can be maintained indefinitely.
As internet providers squeeze retailers the inevitable result is that retailers
will carry less stock, which will make them even less relevant. As internet
providers gain market share they will have more power over wholesalers to
provide stock on demand, so ordering from a retailer or an internet provider
will result in much the same process, waiting for the wholesaler to ship.
There is no
strategy for retailers to turn this around, and for many types of products and
services traditional retail outlets will have no future. Quite frankly consumers are better off in
the long run developing the habit of product research and price comparing,
rather than indulging in impulse purchases that retailers depend on.
No comments:
Post a Comment